CONCEPTUAL DECOMPOSITION OF THE PROBLEM
Decision-making in the domain of capital asset acquisition planning reflects the hierarchical
structures of tax and financial accounting regulations. As a result, classification problem solving
offers a natural approach for selecting an appropriate acquisition type based on a firm's current
status and goals. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) delineates a hierarchy of transaction types in
order to determine the correct tax treatment for each acquisition [11], and the Financial Accounting
Standards Board (FASB) has created its own classifications to insure that a firm's financial reports
represent its standing as fairly as possible [1,13]. To a lesser extent, the corresponding tax
regulations and financial accounting standards impose a natural ordering on the process of selecting
one transaction type from among a set of alternative types. These hierarchies can be viewed from
two different perspectives. The IRS and the FASB use their own structures to classify completed
transactions for the purpose of insuring regulatory compliance by the parties involved. The parties
themselves potential buyers and lessees, potential sellers and lessors attempt to achieve the most
favorable tax and reporting effects by using a composite hierarchy, assembled using compiled
knowledge, to choose a transaction type having the desired characteristics.